Non-definability of the class of complete bundled trees

Logic Journal of the IGPL 7 (1):125-136 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In several semantics for branching-time logic, the evaluation rules involve a quantification over the set of all histories in a given tree-like structure T. These semantics are often generalized by replacing these quantifications by quantifications over a bundle in T, that is, over a set of histories fulfilling suitable closure properties. According to this generalization, the basic semantical structures are pairs 〈T, B〉 in which B is a bundle in T.The problem of the definability of the class of complete bundled trees, in a given class G, concerns the existence of a set Γ of formulas such that, for every bundled tree 〈T, B〉 in G, Γ is true in 〈T, B〉 if and only if B is the set of all histories in T. In Ockhamist branching-time logic, sets Γ corresponding to particular classes G have been found. It will be proved that Γ does not exist if G is the class of all bundled trees

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
34 (#667,296)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Transition Semantics for Branching Time.Antje Rumberg - 2016 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25 (1):77-108.
An axiomatization of full computation tree logic.M. Reynolds - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1011-1057.
Temporal logic.Antony Galton - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references