Facts, Freedom and Foreknowledge

Religious Studies 23 (1):19 - 28 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is God's foreknowledge compatible with human freedom? One of the most attractive attempts to reconcile the two is the Ockhamistic view, which subscribes not only to human freedom and divine omniscience, but retains our most fundamental intuitions concerning God and time: that the past is immutable, that God exists and acts in time, and that there is no backward causation. In order to achieve all that, Ockhamists distinguish ‘hard facts’ about the past which cannot possibly be altered from ‘soft facts’ about the past which are alterable, and argue that God's prior beliefs about human actions are soft facts about the past

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-29

Downloads
164 (#141,968)

6 months
28 (#119,929)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Widerker
Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan

References found in this work

Singular terms, truth-value gaps, and free logic.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (17):481-495.
Divine omniscience and voluntary action.Nelson Pike - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):27-46.
Is the existence of God a "hard" fact?Marilyn McCord Adams - 1967 - Philosophical Review 76 (4):492-503.
Freedom and foreknowledge.John Martin Fischer - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (1):67-79.
On divine foreknowledge and human freedom.Joshua Hoffman & Gary Rosenkrantz - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (3):289 - 296.

Add more references