- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reliable Debiasing Techniques in Legal Contexts? : Weak Signals from a darker Corner of the Social Science Universe
Studies in Logic and Argumentation 59:173-196 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Debiasing and Rule of Law.Frank Zenker & Christian Dahlman - 2016 - In Eveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, Jose Plug & Carel Smith (eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law. Eleven International Publishing. pp. 217-229.
Parmenides as Secret Hero. Gregor Betz’s Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen : Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2010, 292 pp, ISBN: 978-3-465-03629-6, EUR 49.00.Frank Zenker - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):513-525.
Giving Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Decision Making.Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman & Farhan Sarwar - 2016 - Studies in Logic 62:809-823.
Reasons Pro et Contra as a Debiasing Technique in Legal Contexts.Zenker Frank, Dahlman Christian, Bååth Rasmus & Sarwar Farhan - forthcoming - Psychological Reports.
Economic Logic and Legal Logic.Lewis A. Kornhauser - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 711-745.
Contextual Debiasing and Critical Thinking: Reasons for Optimism.Vasco Correia - forthcoming - Topoi 35 (1):1-9.
False polarization: debiasing as applied social epistemology.Tim Kenyon - 2014 - Synthese 191 (11):2529-2547.
The Analysis and Evaluation of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Legal Theory and Argumentation Theory.Eveline Feteris & Harm Klossterhuis - 2009 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 16 (29).
Foundational studies Logical Principles and Frameworks Meaning Reasoning in Deontic Contexts Applications Legal practice and Computer-Based Modelisations Argumentation Theory Historical perspectives Legal reasoning in Ancient Roman, Arabic, Jewish and Far-East contexts Others contexts.. Keynote Speakers Walter Young and Matthias Armgardt.Shahid Rahman, Matthias Armgardt, Hans Christian, Nordtveit Kvernenes & Walter Young - unknown
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-01-13
Downloads
23 (#944,212)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
2020-01-13
Downloads
23 (#944,212)
6 months
9 (#495,347)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild.Frank Zenker - 2018 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 27 (4):421-451.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2