- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: argumentation between doctors and patients: understanding clinical argumentative discourse
Argumentation 37 (1):147-152 (2022)
Abstract
The latest book is a timely application of the Pragma-Dialectical argumentative approach to medical consultation. The book consists of six chapters, which are concerned with topics pertaining to resolving differences of the opinion in doctor-patient interaction. With the publication of the book, the authors have made new contributions to the field of doctor-patient argumentative discourse.
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Frans H. A. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):439-445.
Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds.): From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory: Cham (CH), Springer (= Argumentation Library, 35), 2020, 289 pp.Fernando Leal - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (3):389-397.
Review of: Frans H. van Eemeren : Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics, Cham , Springer , 880 pp. [REVIEW]Fernando Leal - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):527-532.
Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation: John Benjamins Publishing Company, Argumentation in Context , Vol. 2, Amsterdam/philadelphia, 2010, XII + 308 pp. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
Book review: Frans H van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Youzhi Sun - 2020 - Discourse Studies 22 (4):533-535.
Review of Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse in Context, eds. Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]Ann Burnette - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):543-545.
Book review: Frans H van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds), Exploring Argumentative Contexts. [REVIEW]Haipeng Hu - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (5):699-701.
Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation by Frans H. van Eemeren.Christopher Tindale - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (3):364-372.
Frans H. van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Karen Tracy - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):253-258.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-07-05
Downloads
17 (#1,146,966)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
2022-07-05
Downloads
17 (#1,146,966)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2018 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation.Frans H. Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst & A. Francisca Sn Henkemans - 2015 - Routledge.
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1999 - Discourse Studies 1 (4):479-497.
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (4):426-430.
“Let Me Tell You Why!”. When Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Interaction Makes a Difference.Sara Rubinelli & Peter J. Schulz - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):353-375.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2