Ethical Analysis of “Mind Reading” or “Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension”: Keeping Potential Limitations in Mind

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):32-34 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We appreciate Meynen’s examination of ethical implications of using neurotechnologies to decode neural data and make inferences about cognitive processes. Here, we address three issues that we beli...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Do We Conduct Fruitful Ethical Analysis of Speculative Neurotechnologies?Lucie White - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):1-4.
Privacy Concerns in Brain–Computer Interfaces.Jan Christoph Bublitz - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):30-32.
Further Ethical Concerns for Neurotechnological Thought Apprehension in Medicine.Nathan Stout - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):28-29.
Thought Apprehension: The “True” Self and The Risks of Mind Reading.Andrea Lavazza - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 10 (1):19-21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-10

Downloads
36 (#658,719)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?