Natural and Other Kinds

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 62 (1):67-76 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Real notion is distinct from nominal one and connected with objective borderlines and essential properties of objects. Do scientists know the real natural kinds or produce schemas and concepts in theories from constructive activity of imagination and, therefore, group objects by pragmatic means of language, rather than in accordance to world structure? Does the differentiation of sciences follow the orders of things or is it influenced by the social and communicative nature of science? Can we mix a sort of constructivism and realism in epistemology? The classification of sciences made by A.Yu. Antonovski is discussed in the following article, and it is explained what are natural and other kinds from the viewpoint of referential potential theory by P. Kitcher, P.K. Stanford and others.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,180

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references