本书收集作者《国语》, 《左传》研究方面的论文十篇, 这些论文曾先后发表于《中研院史语所集刊》, 《国学研究》等学术刊物上, 为作者在先秦史研究上的代表之作. 本书论文首先说明所论问题的研究状况及分歧, 对不同的观点进行分析探讨, 进而得出自己的结论. 对问题的论述层层深入, 鞭辟入里; 对史料的收集、甄别和辩驳也十分严谨, 言必有据, 不空发议论. 本书所收论文在台湾虽已发表多年, 但在《国语》, 《左传》研究方面仍有较大的参考价值.

本书内容包括:四岳之后、姓氏称谓、东海上人、早年坎坷、时定入周、为文王师、封建齐国、强国方略、政略特色等。.

本书主要内容包括:史料困境的突破与儒家系谱的重建;郭店竹简《性自命出》篇初探;竹帛《五行》为子思、孟子所作论;竹简《五行》分经解论:《五行》章句简注;竹简《五行》与子思思想研究等.

本书为大型资料汇编丛书"儒教资料类编"之第七辑.这一辑, 将在前几辑的基础上继续展示清代中后期, 主要是清末儒者的儒教意识. 本辑所要回答的, 还有所谓"儒学宗教化"问题. 一些学者认为, 儒教本来不是教, 是康有为要把它宗教化.

本书是罗根泽对诸子的哲学研究,包括《古史辨》第四册《诸子丛考》自序;战国前无私家著作说;由《墨子》引经推测儒墨两家与经书之关系;《墨子》探源等内容。.

本书共分5个章节,主要对诠释学视域下的魏晋玄学作了探讨和研究。具体内容包括三玄、玄学与诠释;魏晋经典诠释方式的探索者:何晏;魏晋经典诠释方式的确立者:王弼;回归真实的存在:裴頠与郭象基于现实关怀的诠释 取向等.

In the 20th century, the adaptation of William Shakespeare's classic dramas onto the Chinese stage have attracted great interest. The study of such cross-cultural adaptations has positive significance not only for development of literary theory, literary criticism and literary history, but also in that it promotes unusual forms of innovation with regards to the study of performance in general. Chinese adaptations to performance and opera have allowed Chinese people to understand the essence of Shakespeare's plays, (...) presented in a more forms, and as a consequence, such adaptations function as a bridge for Sino-foreign cross-cultural exchanges and interpretations. These paper traces a panorama of Shakespeare's adaptations onto the Chinese stage in the year that celebrates the 500 anniversary of his death. (shrink)

Li Zehou is widely regarded as one of China's most influential contemporary thinkers. He has produced influential theories of the development of Chinese thought and the place of aesthetics in Chinese ethics and value theory. This book is the first English-language translation of Li Zehou's work on classical Chinese thought. It includes chapters on the classical Chinese thinkers, including Confucius, Mozi, Laozi, Sunzi, Xunzi and Zhuangzi, and also on later eras and thinkers such as Dong Zhongshu (...) in the Han Dynasty and the Song-Ming Neo-Confucians. The essays in this book not only discuss these historical figures and their ideas, but also consider their historical significance, and how key themes from these early schools reappeared in and shaped later periods and thinkers. Taken together, they highlight the breadth of Li Zehou's scholarship and his syncretic approach-his explanations of prominent thinkers and key periods in Chinese intellectual history blend ideas from both the Chinese and Western canons, while also drawing on contemporary thinkers in both traditions. The book also includes an introduction written by the translator that helpfully explains the significance of Li Zehou's work and its prospects for fostering cross-cultural dialogue with Western philosophy. A History of Chinese Classical Thought will be of interest to advanced students and scholars interested in Chinese philosophy, comparative philosophy, and Chinese intellectual and social history. (shrink)

「文內」和「文外」指的是文本與文本以外所有外緣因素之間的關係。文本猶如王陽明所謂的山花，只是白紙黑字，本身並無任何意義，意義的產生全憑讀者的觀照，一經觀照，「顏色一時明白起來。便知此花不在你的心外。」 《易‧繫辭下》謂「苟非其人，道不虛行」，正可借來形容文本與讀者之間共存的關係和詮釋的本體根據。儘管讀者的想像可以漫無邊際，但也並非毫無客觀制約。在文本的文外詮釋，須兼顧讀者本人的客觀因素和主觀關懷，其 範圍最終必由讀者本人的見識以及其時代關懷、風氣觀念和思想史脈絡所決定。 本書分為四個部分：第一部分名為「通義」，一方面〈導論〉討論文內文外兩種詮釋取向在先秦時期形成的大致情況；另一方面，論「朋」一文又從思想史的角度縱覽《論語》首章中「朋」字從西漢一直到清初的詮釋發展。第二 部分名為「文內之詮釋」，共收兩篇論文，分別確定《莊子》和《論語》中相關篇章的本義。第三部分名為「文化史中的文外詮釋」，共收四篇論文，討論的經典包括儒、道、釋三家。四篇論文的一個共同目的在於論證文化史的 外緣影響可以幫助我們如實地認識經典詮釋的原貌和精神。第四部分名為「思想史中的文外詮釋」，共收三篇論文，重點在指出經典詮釋在政治背景和思想史脈絡中可以衍伸出新穎的思想內容。.

本书分为“理论与背景”、“先秦儒家与经典诠释”、“传统儒者解经方法及其现代转折”三个部分.

In "On Variations of the Classical Chinese Literary Genre terminchinesescript in Literary History," the authors analyze the representation of the classical Chinese literary genre Fu, or namely, rhapsode, in Chinese literary histories compiled in English. A unique classical literary genre, Fu commonly appears in classical Chinese literature as well as in aesthetics and philosophy, thus constituting an important part in Chinese literature in all periods from ancient to contemporary. However, Fu falls outside the quartered-division (...) of modern western stylistics, so is bound to cause problems in the compilation of a literary history in the Anglophone literary culture, as is the case in Sinology. This paper argues that variations caused in the translation of the name Fu and its configuration set-up in the English context have resulted in the under exploration of its full meanings in existing relevant studies, which necessitates future research for the sake of substantially changing the peripheral status of Chinese literature in the arena of world literature. (shrink)