Results for 'interstimulus interval'

981 found
Order:
  1.  47
    Interstimulus interval and time estimation in ratings of signaled shock aversiveness.Milton D. Suboski, Tonnar G. Brace, Louise A. Jarrold, Kurt J. Teller & Richard Dieter - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (2):407.
  2.  20
    The interstimulus interval and the latency of the conditioned eyelid response.C. Alan Boneau - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 (6):464.
  3.  34
    Interstimulus interval and CS duration effects in differential conditioning.Laird S. Cermak & Delos D. Wickens - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):233.
  4.  20
    Gsr conditioning with long interstimulus intervals.Mitchel C. Morrow & Thomas E. Keough - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (3p1):460.
  5.  24
    Effects of interstimulus interval length and variability on habituation of autonomic components of the orienting response.Robert J. Gatchel & Peter J. Lang - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):802.
  6.  31
    Effects of interstimulus interval and discrimination learning in eyelid conditioning using between- and within-ss designs.Gregory A. Kimble, Thomas B. Leonard & Lawrence C. Perlmuter - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):652.
  7.  14
    Effect of interstimulus intervals and rest-period length upon habituation of the orienting response.James H. Geer - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):617.
  8.  58
    Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy, Harvey C. Ebel & Donald D. Thompson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):138.
  9.  41
    Interstimulus interval effects in GSR discrimination conditioning.Russell A. Lockhart & William W. Grings - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (3):209.
  10.  36
    Effect of interstimulus interval on conditioning of voluntary instructed responses.Lawrence C. Perlmuter, Alan M. Fink, Gary A. Taylor & Gregory A. Kimble - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):403.
  11.  36
    Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
  12.  21
    Latencies and interstimulus intervals in a sequence of motor responses.Paul Fraisse - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 16 (1):47-50.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  47
    Time estimation and the interstimulus interval function in classical conditioning.Kurt J. Teller, Richard Dieter & Milton D. Suboski - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):445.
  14.  29
    Effects of stimulus complexity, interstimulus interval, and masking task conditions in differential eyelid conditioning.Melanie J. Mayer & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):469.
  15.  20
    Differential rabbit eyelid conditioning as a function of age, interstimulus interval, and cue similarity.Peter W. Frey - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):326.
  16.  28
    Effects of trace versus delay conditioning, interstimulus interval variability, and instructions on UCR diminution.William W. Grings & Anne M. Schell - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):136.
  17.  23
    Human eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Harold D. Fishbein & Mary Leblanc - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):130.
  18.  21
    Backward and forward masking as a function of number of letters, interstimulus interval, and luminance.Harold S. Zamansky, Bertram Scharf & Roger F. Brightbill - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):235.
  19.  34
    Comparison of trace and delay classical eyelid conditioning as a function of interstimulus interval.Susan M. Ross & Leonard E. Ross - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (1):165.
  20.  24
    Recruitment, latency, magnitude, and amplitude of the GSR as a function of interstimulus interval.William F. Prokasy, James T. Fawcett & John F. Hall - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (5):513.
  21.  23
    Effect of UCS intensity upon the acquisition of conditioned responses acquired under a lengthened interstimulus interval.Kenneth R. Burstein - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (2):147.
  22.  55
    Differential classical eyelid conditioning as a function of CS intensity, CS rise time, and interstimulus interval.Susan M. Wilcox & Leonard E. Ross - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):272.
  23.  25
    Latency and magnitude of GSR as a function of interstimulus interval.Arno F. Wittig & Delos D. Wickens - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):466.
  24.  33
    Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning.Arne Ohman, Par A. Bjorkstrand & Per E. Ellstrom - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):145.
  25.  25
    Effect of interstimulus interval and heterogeneity of difference on same-different judgments of visual patterns.Lester E. Krueger & Ronald G. Shapiro - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (1):43-46.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  34
    Internal contours, intercontour distance, and interstimulus intervals: The complex interaction in metacontrast.Lester A. Lefton - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (5):891.
  27.  37
    Delay versus trace heart-rate classical discrimination conditioning in rabbits as a function of interstimulus interval.Alexander A. Manning, Neil Schneiderman & Daniel S. Lordahl - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):225.
  28.  34
    The orienting reflex as a function of the interstimulus interval of compound stimuli.Charles K. Allen, Frances A. Hill & Delos D. Wickens - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):309.
  29.  21
    Response latency as a function of interstimulus interval in conditioned eyelid discrimination.William E. Vandament - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):561.
  30.  42
    Neural adaptation of visual ERP components: Effects of adaptor stimulus duration and interstimulus interval.Feuerriegel Daniel, Churches Owen, Kohler Mark & Keage Hannah - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  31.  20
    Associative symmetry: VI. The effect of varying the interstimulus interval upon backward learning during classical conditioning.Leonard Brosgole & Fred C. Annicelli - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (3):201-204.
  32.  18
    Growth of a percept as a function of interstimulus interval.Gerald M. Murch - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):121.
  33.  17
    Differential skin conductance condition as a function of interstimulus interval.William R. Jenson & William F. Prokasy - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2 (6):397-399.
  34.  13
    Perceptual memory over very short interstimulus intervals.Donald Laming & Daryl Wightman - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (2):170-172.
  35.  23
    Pseudoconditioning as a function of specific schedules of interstimulus intervals.Barry Ledwidge & Kenneth R. Burstein - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (6):495-497.
  36.  18
    Verbal discrimination learning theory and differential eyelid conditioning to related words at three interstimulus intervals.Louise C. Perry - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):299-302.
  37.  43
    Short-term retention of auditory sequences as a function of stimulus duration, intersimulus interval, and encoding technique.John G. Miscik, Jerald M. Smith, Norman H. Hamm, Kenneth A. Deffenbacher & Evan L. Brown - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):147.
  38.  27
    Temporal variables in paired-associates learning: The roles of repetition and number tracking during stimulus intervals.Calvin F. Nodine, Barbara F. Nodine & Rex C. Thomas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (3):439.
  39.  35
    Verbal control of an autonomic response in a cue reversal situation.William W. Grings, Anne M. Schell & Cheryl A. Carey - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):215.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  40.  17
    Binocular summation over time in the perception of form at brief durations.Charles W. Eriksen & Thomas S. Greenspon - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):331.
  41.  16
    Effects of poststimulus study time on recognition of pictures.George E. Weaver - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):799.
  42.  70
    Perceived Shape at a Slant as a Function of Processing Time and Processing Load.William Epstein, Gary Hatfield & Gerard Muise - 1977 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3:473–483.
    Shape and slant judgments of rotated or frontoparallel ellipses were elicited from three groups of 10 subjects. A masking stimulus was introduced to control processing time. Backward masking trials were presented with interstimulus intervals of 0, 25, and 50 msec, Reduction of processing time altered shape judgments in the direction of projective shape and slant judgments in the direction of frontoparallelness. This finding is consistent with the shape-slant invariance hypothesis. In order to study the effects of processing load, one (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  43.  95
    Stroop interference with successive presentations of separate incongruent words and colors.Frederick N. Dyer & Laurence J. Severance - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):438.
  44.  27
    Sequential effects of serial reaction time.Neil H. Kirby - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):32.
  45.  12
    Effect of whole-hand water flow stimulation on the neural balance between excitation and inhibition in the primary somatosensory cortex.Dat Le Cong, Daisuke Sato, Koyuki Ikarashi, Tomomi Fujimoto, Genta Ochi & Koya Yamashiro - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:962936.
    Sustained peripheral somatosensory stimulations, such as high-frequency repetitive somatosensory stimulation (HF-RSS) and vibrated stimulation, are effective in altering the balance between excitation and inhibition in the somatosensory cortex (S1) and motor cortex (M1). A recent study reported that whole-hand water flow (WF) stimulation induced neural disinhibition in the M1. Based on previous results, we hypothesized that whole-hand WF stimulation would lead to neural disinhibition in the S1 because there is a strong neural connection between M1 and S1 and aimed to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  23
    Bimodal Presentation Speeds up Auditory Processing and Slows Down Visual Processing.Christopher W. Robinson, Robert L. Moore & Thomas A. Crook - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:395363.
    Many situations require the simultaneous processing of auditory and visual information, however, stimuli presented to one sensory modality can sometimes interfere with processing in a second sensory modality (i.e., modality dominance). The current study further investigated modality dominance by examining how task demands and bimodal presentation affect speeded auditory and visual discriminations. Participants in the current study had to quickly determine if two words, two pictures, or two word-picture pairings were the same or different, and we manipulated task demands across (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47.  39
    Logical Metonymy Resolution in a Words‐as‐Cues Framework: Evidence From Self‐Paced Reading and Probe Recognition.Alessandra Zarcone, Sebastian Padó & Alessandro Lenci - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (5):973-996.
    Logical metonymy resolution (begin a book begin reading a book or begin writing a book) has traditionally been explained either through complex lexical entries (qualia structures) or through the integration of the implicit event via post-lexical access to world knowledge. We propose that recent work within the words-as-cues paradigm can provide a more dynamic model of logical metonymy, accounting for early and dynamic integration of complex event information depending on previous contextual cues (agent and patient). We first present a self-paced (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48.  21
    Magnitude of ucr as a function of variability in the cs-ucs relationship.Shirley C. Peeke & William W. Grings - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):64.
  49.  23
    -Shaped metacontrast functions with a detection task.Sue Cox & William N. Dember - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):327.
  50.  27
    Refractory period of c-reactions.Paul Bertelson & Francoise Tisseyre - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1p1):122.
1 — 50 / 981