A Discussion on the Justification of the Founding of Joseon and Criticism of Heterodoxy by Jeong Do-jeon

THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA 62:145-175 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jeong Do-jeon 鄭道傳 is evaluated as a planner and hero of the founding of Joseon 朝鮮. In dramas and liberal arts books, Mencius’ theory of “revolution” is presented as the basis for justifying the founding of Joseon. For this reason, the justification for the founding of Joseon appears to have been proven, making it seem like a matter that no longer requires further discussion. However, when examining the literature dealing with the founding of Joseon, the existing Sambongjip 三峯集 does not use revolution in relation to the founding of Joseon. Here, we can ask the following questions to the protagonist of the founding, namely Jeong Do-jeon. “How do you explain the series of events of the destruction of Goryeo 高麗 and the founding of Joseon?” and “How do you justify the founding of Joseon?” This is not limited to his thoughts, but also focuses on his work of justifying the founding of Joseon with documents. This article discusses Jeong Do-jeon’s arguments, made around the founding of Joseon, regardidng what scholar-officials needed to do for Confucianism to properly fulfill its role in Goryeo society. Next, I would like to look at the context in which Jeong Do-jeon asserts the legitimacy of the founding of Joseon. Through this, I would like to clarify that ‘establishing a country’ is justified by concepts such as “establishing the Eastern Zhou” (爲東周) in the Analects and “innovation” (維新) or “politics of innovation” (維新之治) in the Classic of Poetry (詩經).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Should Ascend the Throne?Youngsun Back - 2021 - Journal of World Philosophies 6 (1):58-72.
Confucian Happiness of Jeong Do-jeon. 전병욱 - 2015 - Journal of Eastern Philosophy 84 (84):9-39.
Seol Tae-hee's Theory of Silhak and Criticism of Joseon Neo-Confucianism.Yun Kyeong Kim - 2021 - THE JOURNAL OF ASIAN PHILOSOPHY IN KOREA 55:151-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references