Argumentative Patterns in the Political Domain: The Case of European Parliamentary Committees of Inquiry

Argumentation 30 (1):45-60 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, close attention is paid to the argumentative patterns resulting from combining pragmatic argumentation in which a recommendation is made with arguments in which the majority is invoked. I focus on such argumentative patterns as employed by European parliamentary committees of inquiry conducting inquiries into the activity of the Equitable Life Assurance Society. By incorporating legal and political insights about the activity of these parliamentary committees of inquiry into a pragma-dialectical argumentative approach, an analysis will be given of the selected argumentative pattern. This analysis will reveal which standpoints are supported by which arguments and how these arguments relate to each other to increase the acceptability of the recommendation made. In addition, the analysis will explain the arguer’s argumentative choices in the pattern employed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate.Bart Garssen - 2013 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):33-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-23

Downloads
37 (#662,590)

6 months
2 (#1,352,274)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?