Ernst Mayr's 'ultimate/proximate' distinction reconsidered and reconstructed

Biology and Philosophy 18 (4):553-565 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It's been 41 years since the publication of Ernst Mayr's Cause and Effect in Biology wherein Mayr most clearly develops his version of the influential distinction between ultimate and proximate causes in biology. In critically assessing Mayr's essay I uncover false statements and red-herrings about biological explanation. Nevertheless, I argue to uphold an analogue of the ultimate/proximate distinction as it refers to two different kinds of explanations, one dynamical the other statistical.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
225 (#118,235)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

André Ariew
University of Missouri, Columbia

References found in this work

Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 1993 - Boulder, Colo.: Routledge.
Functions.John Bigelow & Robert Pargetter - 1987 - Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):181-196.
The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus.Elliott Sober - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (3):397-399.

View all 21 references / Add more references