Uk ok?

The Philosophers' Magazine 18:36-36 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1354814X

DOI

10.5840/tpm20021885

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Make your self scarce: The Ego Trick: What Does it Mean to be You? by Julian Baggini (Granta)£ 14.99. [REVIEW]Robert J. Howell - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 55:100-101.
Aphorisms rule OK. [REVIEW]Nicholas Fearn - 2002 - The Philosophers' Magazine 17 (17):56-56.
When is it OK to Compromise on Ethical Principles?Mark D. White - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 73:48-53.
Silly science is ok, just as long as it’s not fraudulent.Wendy M. Grossman - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 33:96-96.
Family ties.Jean Kazez - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53:79-84.
Animal husbandry. [REVIEW]Jean Kazez - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):117-118.
Make yer spuds and whatever. [REVIEW]Jean Kazez - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):116-117.
Security and the 'war on terror': a roundtable.Julian Baggini, Alex Voorhoeve, Catherine Audard, Saladin Meckled-Garcia & Tony McWalter - 2007 - In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What More Philosophers Think. Continuum. pp. 19-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
61 (#350,882)

6 months
8 (#597,840)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references