Confirmation and the dutch book argument

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):393-397 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/24.4.393

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Consequences of a simple extension of the dutch book argument.J. M. Ryder - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (2):164-167.
Carnap and de finetti on bets and the probability of singular events: The dutch book argument reconsidered.Klaus Heilig - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):325-346.
Intersubjective probability and confirmation theory.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):513-533.
"Natural Science and the Spiritual Life." By John Baillie.A. C. Crombie - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 ([9/12]):210.
A dutch book and subjective probabilities.P. G. Moore - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):263-266.
Is there a dutch book argument for probability kinematics?Brad Armendt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
Logical versus historical theories of confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
Countable additivity and subjective probability.Jon Williamson - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):401-416.
Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 227–233.Agassi J.. Corroboration versus induction. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 9 , pp. 311–317.Alexander H. G.. The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to Dr. Agassi. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 229–234.Watkins J. W. N.. Confirmation without background knowledge. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 10 , pp. 318–320. [REVIEW]David Kaplan - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (2):249-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
150 (#155,450)

6 months
19 (#140,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Decision theory as philosophy.Mark Kaplan - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):549-577.
Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri, Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 229--251.
Arguments for–or against–Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):793-819.
Scotching Dutch Books?Alan Hájek - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):139-151.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and probability.Frank Ramsey - 2010 - In Antony Eagle, Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 52-94.
Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic.Imre Lakatos - 1968 - In The problem of inductive logic. Amsterdam,: North Holland Pub. Co.. pp. 315--417.
Carnap’s Theory of Probability and Induction.John G. Kemeny - 1963 - In Paul Arthur Schilpp, The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.,: Open Court. pp. 711--738.
The Logical Foundations of Probability. [REVIEW]Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (13):362-364.

Add more references