- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Consequences of a simple extension of the dutch book argument
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (2):164-167 (1981)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Confirmation and the dutch book argument.Patricia Baillie - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):393-397.
Carnap and de finetti on bets and the probability of singular events: The dutch book argument reconsidered.Klaus Heilig - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):325-346.
A dutch book and subjective probabilities.P. G. Moore - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):263-266.
Is there a dutch book argument for probability kinematics?Brad Armendt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
Contributions to Logic and Methodology in Honor of J. M. Bocheński.Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka - 1966 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (64):349-351.
Countable additivity and subjective probability.Jon Williamson - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):401-416.
Review of H. J. Bos, M. J. S. Snelders and R. P. W. Visser: Studies on Christian Huygens. [REVIEW]Aant Elzinga - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):295-303.
Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries Petrus Ramus en de wiskunde. By J. J. Verdenk. Assen, Netherlands. Van Gorcum. 1966. Pp. x + 455. 34.90 Dutch guilders. [REVIEW]A. J. E. M. Smeur - 1968 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (2):188-189.
Review of J. AGASSI, R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky: Science in Flux, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28. [REVIEW]Noretta Koertge - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):405-408.
J. M. Keynes's theoretical approach to decision-making under conditions of risk and uncertainty.Michael Emmett Brady - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):357-376.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#338,703)
6 months
17 (#166,136)
2009-01-28
Downloads
62 (#338,703)
6 months
17 (#166,136)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Arguments For—Or Against—Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer. pp. 229--251.
Arguments for–or against–Probabilism?Alan Hájek - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):793-819.
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Intersubjective probability and confirmation theory.Donald Gillies - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):513-533.
References found in this work
On cognitive capacity.Noam A. Chomsky - 1975 - In Noam Chomsky (ed.), Reflections On Language. Temple Smith.
Liberty and Language.Geoffrey Sampson - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (4):416-419.
Between Chomskian rationalism and Popperian empiricism.Stephen P. Stich - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):329-47.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2