Time Deposits, Dimensions, and Fraud

Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):711-716 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We stipulate, arguendo, that fractional-reserve-demand deposit banking is per se fraudulent. We ask whether or not time deposit banking can also be illicit, and answer in the positive, if there is a mismatch between the time dimensions of deposits and loans. To wit, if an intermediary borrows short and lends long

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,992

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
57 (#407,550)

6 months
14 (#220,939)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Some ethical dilemmas of modern banking.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2013 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 22 (3):235-245.
Some ethical dilemmas of modern banking.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2013 - Business Ethics: A European Review 22 (3):235-245.
The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):295-300.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references