- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Authenticity Requirement: Why Using Digital Twins for Achieving Person-Span Extension Goods Can Be Self-Defeating
American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):120-123 (2025)
Abstract
Iglesias et al. (2025) argue that digital twins could serve as tools for achieving certain person-span extension goods, specifically legacy/impact and relational aims. The former pertain to broadly...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
I Contain Multitudes: A Typology of Digital Doppelgängers.William D’Alessandro, Trenton W. Ford & Michael Yankoski - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):132-134.
Digital Doppelgängers: They Will Matter When Conscious.Christos Lazaridis - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):111-112.
Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?Samuel Iglesias, Brian D. Earp, Cristina Voinea, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Anda Zahiu, Nancy S. Jecker & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):95-110.
Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?Samuel Iglesias, Brian D. Earp, Cristina Voinea, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Anda Zahiu, Nancy S. Jecker & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):95-110.
Who Achieves What? The Subjective Dimension of the Objective Goods of Life Extension in the Ethics of Digital Doppelgängers.Joan Llorca Albareda, Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho & Pablo García-Barranquero - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):134-137.
Digital Doppelgängers Cannot Be Ethically Created.Matti Häyry & Amanda Sukenick - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):118-120.
Bytes the Dust: Normative Notions in Decommissioning Digital Doppelgängers.Andrew J. Barnhart, Giuseppe Comerci & Matthias Braun - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):126-129.
Health Digital Twins, Legal Liability, and Medical Practice.Andreas Kuersten - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (9):66-69.
Extending the Self: Examining Motivations and Philosophies in Life Extension Communities.Alberto Aparicio - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):129-131.
Analytics
Added to PP
2025-01-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2025-01-30
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Digital Doppelgängers and Lifespan Extension: What Matters?Samuel Iglesias, Brian D. Earp, Cristina Voinea, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Anda Zahiu, Nancy S. Jecker & Julian Savulescu - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):95-110.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2