Digital Doppelgängers: They Will Matter When Conscious

American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):111-112 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It seems plausible that digital doppelgängers may help us achieve certain aims or ostensible goods of person-span extension (Iglesias et al. 2025). I am thinking of the writer example who only need...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Digital Doppelgängers Cannot Be Ethically Created.Matti Häyry & Amanda Sukenick - 2025 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):118-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-30

Downloads
3 (#1,867,272)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On Bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Personal identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
ChatGPT is bullshit.Michael Townsen Hicks, James Humphries & Joe Slater - 2024 - Ethics and Information Technology 26 (2):1-10.

View all 8 references / Add more references