Introducing Levinas to undergraduate philosophers

Abstract

The question of the source of the moral "ought" is no small question, nor is it unimportant. Our own philosophical tradition has dealt with the question in several ways producing a variety of answers. Some of these include locating the "ought" in the structure of reason, in the human being's desire for pleasure, or in the will of God. The reason why the question is so important is because different conceptions of the source of the moral ought ultimately give rise to different conceptions of what is right and wrong; they also affect the way we answer the biggest of all ethical questions, why be good

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Why Should I Be Moral?D. A. Lloyd Thomas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):128 - 139.
Manuscript on Morals.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In H. A. Prichard (ed.), Moral writings. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Moral Life. [REVIEW]T. A. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):355-356.
Bentham's 'two theses' argument.Oded Balaban - 2004 - Manuscrito 27 (2):405-430.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#220,126)

6 months
96 (#64,367)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony Beavers
Indiana University

Citations of this work

Dialogue as a Site of Transformative Possibility.Shilpi Sinha - 2010 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5):459-475.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references