A compendium of C. S. Peirce's 1866--1885 work

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (1):109-115 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1305/ndjfl/1093891617

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

C. S. S. Peirce and E. G. A. Husserl on the nature of logic.Albert A. Mullin - 1966 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (4):301-304.
${\rm S}4.6$ is ${\rm S}4.9$.J. Jay Zeman - 1972 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):118-118.
${\rm S}3.02={\rm S}3.03$.George F. Schumm - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (1):147-148.
The Guptα-Belnαp Systems S and S* are not Axiomatisable.Philip Kremer - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
S$1\deg$ and generalized S$5$-axioms. [REVIEW]Ivo Thomas - 1963 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4 (2):153-154.
A theorem on ${\rm S}4.2$ and ${\rm S}4.4$.Ivo Thomas - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (4):335-336.
The deduction theorem in ${\rm S}4,$ ${\rm S}4.2$, and ${\rm S}5$.J. Jay Zeman - 1967 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2):56-60.
The Gupta-Belnap systems ${\rm S}^\#$ and ${\rm S}^*$ are not axiomatisable.Philip Kremer - 1993 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
Bases for S$4$ and S$4.2$ without added axioms. [REVIEW]J. Jay Zeman - 1963 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4 (3):227-230.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
29 (#772,073)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references