Erotic Art as Proprioceptive Art

British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (2):247-258 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The philosophical discussion about erotic art has often been understood in terms of the possibility of erotic art as a form of visual or auditory art. In this article, I focus on erotic experiences qua proprioceptive experiences and I defend the claim that, under the right circumstances, such experiences can bring about proprioceptive artworks.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-26

Downloads
80 (#262,866)

6 months
15 (#210,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jiri Benovsky
University of Fribourg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40).David Hume - 1739 - Mineola, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. Edited by Ernest Campbell Mossner.
A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Of the Standard of Taste.David Hume - 1985 - Liberty Fund. Edited by E. Miller.
Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.
The definition of art.Thomas Adajian - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 15 references / Add more references