Self-serving biases and public justifications in trust games

Synthese 190 (5):909-922 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Often, when several norms are present and may be in conflict, individuals will display a self-serving bias, privileging the norm that best serves their interests. Xiao and Bicchieri (J Econ Psychol 31(3):456–470, 2010) tested the effects of inequality on reciprocating behavior in trust games and showed that—when inequality increases—reciprocity loses its appeal. They hypothesized that self-serving biases in choosing to privilege a particular social norm occur when the choice of that norm is publicly justifiable as reasonable, even if not optimal for one of the parties. In line with the literature on motivated reasoning, this justification should find some degree of support among third parties. The results of our experimental survey of third parties support the hypothesis that biases are not always unilateral selfish assessments. Instead, they occur when the choice to favor a particular norm is supported by a shared sense that it is a reasonable and justifiable choice

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,978

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotions, norms, and the genealogy of fairness.Shaun Nichols - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):275-296.
Young Children Enforce Social Norms.Marco F. H. Schmidt & Michael Tomasello - 2012 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (4):232-236.
Trustworthiness is a social norm, but trusting is not.Cristina Bicchieri, Erte Xiao & Ryan Muldoon - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):170-187.
Reasonable Trust.Evan Simpson - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):402-423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-28

Downloads
131 (#180,022)

6 months
12 (#340,696)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugo Mercier
Institut Jean Nicod

References found in this work

Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
What good is moral reasoning?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Mind and Society 10 (2):131-148.
Self-deception: Adaptation or by-product?Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (1):35-35.

View all 6 references / Add more references