Counterfactual logic and the Hardy paradox: Remarks on Shimony and Stein's criticism of Stapp's proof

Abstract

This is an extended critique of comments made by Abner Shimony and Howard Stein on Henry Stapp’s proof of the non-locality of quantum mechanics. Although I claim that ultimately Stapp’s proof does not establish its purported conclusion, yet Shimony and Stein’s criticism contains a number of weak points, which need to be clarified.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Branching space-time, modal logic, and the counterfactual conditional.Thomas Muller - 2002 - In Tomasz Placek & Jeremy Butterfield (eds.), Non-locality and Modality. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 273--291.
Quantum Counterfactuals and Locality.Robert B. Griffiths - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (5):674-684.
Quantum Arrangements.Gregg Jaeger & Anton Zeilinger - 2021 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
Stapp's theorem without counterfactual commitments: Why it fails nonetheless.Michael Dickson - 1993 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (5):791-814.
The Decision Problem for Entanglement.Wayne C. Myrvold - 1997 - In Robert Sonné Cohen, Michael Horne & John J. Stachel (eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement, and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 177--190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#449,779)

6 months
10 (#375,783)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomasz Bigaj
University of Warsaw

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references