Formalizing Cognitive Acceptance of Arguments: Durum Wheat Selection Interdisciplinary Study

, , &
Minds and Machines 27 (1):233-252 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we present an interdisciplinary approach that concerns the problem of argument acceptance in an agronomy setting. We propose a computational cognitive model for argument acceptance based on the dual model system in cognitive psychology. We apply it in an agronomy setting within a French national project on durum wheat.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11023-017-9424-7

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Discovery of empirical theories based on the measurement theory.E. E. Vityaev & B. Y. Kovalerchuk - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):551-573.
Model-based analyses: Promises, pitfalls, and example applications to the study of cognitive control.Rogier B. Mars, Nicholas Shea, Nils Kolling & Matthew F. S. Rushworth - 2012 - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (2):252-267.
Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength.Gustavo A. Bodanza & Esteban Freidin - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (3):247-273.
Real Logic is Nonmonotonic.Henry E. Kyburg - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (4):577-595.
Mechanisms of Reference Frame Selection in Spatial Term Use: Computational and Empirical Studies.Holger Schultheis & Laura A. Carlson - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (2):276-325.
What are cognitive processes? An example-based approach.Albert Newen - 2017 - Synthese 194 (11):4251-4268.
Why cognitive science is not formalized folk psychology.Martin Pickering & Nick Chater - 1995 - Minds and Machines 5 (3):309-337.
Comprehension of Simple Quantifiers: Empirical Evaluation of a Computational Model.Jakub Szymanik & Marcin Zajenkowski - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (3):521-532.
Construction and characterization of a half million clone BAC library of durum wheat.A. Cenci, N. Chantret, X. Kong, Y. Gu, O. D. Anderson, T. Fahima, A. Distelfeld & J. Dubcovsky - unknown
Two projects for understanding the mind: A response to Morris and Richardson. [REVIEW]Nick Chater & Martin Pickering - 1997 - Minds and Machines 7 (4):553-569.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-26

Downloads
36 (#648,142)

6 months
10 (#347,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Madalina Croitoru
University of Montpellier
Florence Dupin De Saint-Cyr

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton, Christopher Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Steven A. Sloman - 1996 - Psychological Bulletin 119 (1):3-22.

View all 13 references / Add more references