Giovanni Pico’s warning against pantheistic implications in Ficino’s Neoplatonism

Intellectual History Review 34 (1):49-66 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The famous controversy between Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola is known to regard the proper use of Platonism in humanist and Christian context. With special attention to Pico’s Commentary on a Canzone, the point of disagreement with Ficino, which is not at all obvious, is examined through a close reading. The result is that Pico sees the temptation of a pantheistic and anthropocentric understanding of the relationship between the human realm and God. Whereas Ficino engaged in making pagan philosophy amenable to Christian theology, Pico was concerned with upholding the otherness of the divine. For the humanist agenda, Ficino made plausible that the human world is divinized, while Pico called for the ascent to God. In Pico’s view the Neoplatonists secularized the divine, as was evident in Ficino’s philosophical theology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,706

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pico, Ficino e la predicabilità dell’Uno.Giovanni Alberti - 2017 - Annuario Filosofico 33:231-255.
Studies in the platonism of Marsilio Ficino and Giovanni Pico.Michael J. B. Allen - 2017 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-19

Downloads
22 (#1,067,006)

6 months
7 (#625,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Richard Blum
Loyola University Maryland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations