Abstract

There are several observations related to magnetism and magnetic fields that the current model of magnetic field patterns fails to explain. However, the alternative model proposed by this hypothesis accounts for these observations comprehensively. Furthermore, the current model cannot adequately explain how or why magnetic attraction and repulsion occur; in fact, it raises more questions than it answers. In contrast, the magnetic field pattern proposed by this hypothesis resolves these issues without introducing inconsistencies or additional dilemmas, while also addressing everything the currently accepted model claims to explain. The entire concept of this hypothesis originated from patterns created by magnets on ferrocells. Until now, science has largely dismissed these patterns as insignificant. However, the interactions revealed by magnets on ferrocells are both fascinating and specific. These interactions suggest that the patterns are not merely decorative but are, in fact, non-random. A model based on these magnetic fields can explain all observations related to magnetism, including magnetism itself. Unfortunately, the scientific community has yet to show interest in these findings. One aspect that the current model of magnetic fields fails to explain is the spikes formed in ferrofluid. Another unresolved question concerns the patterns produced by magnetic fields on ferrocells. Additionally, the direction of magnetism—depicted as moving from north to south—is problematic. Not only is there no evidence to support this directional assumption, but it also creates a dilemma: how can magnets repel each other when their south poles or north poles are brought together? Another major flaw of the currently accepted model is its inability to explain the mechanics of magnetic attraction and repulsion. All of these unanswered questions are addressed by this hypothesis, which offers an alternative pattern of magnetic fields.