On the Limits of Across-the-Board Movement: Distributed Extraction Coordinations

Philosophies 7 (1):10 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper examines distributed extraction coordinations, in which different elements move out of conjuncts of a single coordination, as in _Which book and which magazine did Mary buy and Amy read respectively_, from a crosslinguistic perspective. A number of properties of such coordinations are discussed, which includes showing that they are also subject to the ATB requirement, which will shed light on the nature of the ATB phenomenon itself. It is also shown that there is a rather strong restriction on distributed extractions which confines such extractions to one context and completely excludes one type of movement, in particular head-movement, from participating in them. The higher coordination is shown to be formed during the derivation and to be semantically expletive. Distributed extraction constructions are also shown to have consequences for the proper analysis of a number of phenomena, including subject-oriented anaphors, right node raising, _tough_-constructions, agreement, and clausal structure. Regarding subject-oriented anaphors, the paper teases apart different approaches to subject-oriented anaphors based on constructions where different elements fill SpecvP and SpecTP (the latter undergoes agreement with T and the former binds subject-oriented anaphors).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the identity requirement of ATB extraction.Alan Munn - 1999 - Natural Language Semantics 7 (4):421-425.
Chain Scope and Quantification Structure.Soowon Kim - 1991 - Dissertation, Brandeis University
Across-the-board binding meets verb second.Anna Szabolcsi - 1989 - In M. Nespor & J. Mascaro (eds.), Grammar in progress. Foris.
That-clauses and propositional anaphors.Peter van Elswyk - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):2861-2875.
Controlling number agreement on verbs and anaphors.K. Bock, K. M. Eberhard & J. C. Cutting - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):441-441.
Bare plurals and donkey anaphora.Peter Lasersohn - 1997 - Natural Language Semantics 5 (1):79-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-01

Downloads
10 (#1,484,026)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle.Pierre Pica - 1987 - In Joyce McDunough & Bernadette Plunkett (eds.), Proceedings of The North East Linguistic Society. pp. 17--2.

Add more references