Why to buy your Darling flowers: On cooperation and exploitation

Theory and Decision 50 (1):1--28 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Trusting in someone's cooperation is often connected with the danger of being exploited. So it is important that signals are exchanged which make it probable enough that the potential partner is reliable. Such signals must be too expensive for partners who are planning to abuse the trust they are given but cheap enough for those who wish to initiate a long-term cooperation. In a game theoretical model, it is shown that such signals could consist of presents given before the partnership starts. (edited).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cooperation via Social Networks.Vincent Buskens & Jeroen Weesie - 2000 - Analyse & Kritik 22 (1):44-74.
Cooperation via Hostages.Werner Raub & Jeroen Weesie - 2000 - Analyse & Kritik 22 (1):19-43.
Trust, Reputation, and Exit in Exchange Relationships.Bernd Lahno - 1995 - Journal of Conflict Resolution 39 (3):495-510.
False advertising in biological markets: partner choice and the problem of reliability.Ben Fraser - 2013 - In Kim Sterelny, Richard Joyce, Brett Calcott & Ben Fraser (eds.), Cooperation and its Evolution. MIT Press.
Eating Peas with One’s Fingers: A Semiotic Approach to Law and Social Norms.Bryan H. Druzin - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (2):257-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-01

Downloads
87 (#241,054)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations