Experimental realism defended: how inference to the most likely cause might be sound

In Stephan Hartmann, Luc Bovens & Carl Hoefer (eds.), Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Experimental Realism Defended: How Inference to the Most Likely Cause Might Be Sound.Mauricio Suárez - 2005 - Contingency and Dissent in Science Project, Cpnss, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Experimental realism defended: how inference to the most likely cause might be sound.Mauricio Suárez - 2006 - Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science: Contingency and Dissent in Science 1.
Hartmann, Hoefer & Bovens, eds. 2008. Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science.Sergio F. Martínez - 2011 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 26 (1):90-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-28

Downloads
3 (#1,852,372)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Luc Bovens
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Carl Hoefer
Universitat de Barcelona
Stephan Hartmann
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references