Abstract

Supporting the view that ethics can be taught, this paper will explore the frequent lack of a philosophical foundation in scientific training and its impact on a course on ‘Science and ethics.’ The incidence of cases of misconduct by scientists engaged in basic research led the United States to establish the Office of Research Integrity. Their publication, “Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research” covers the ethical conduct of research and defines misconduct as fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. Concern for breach of public trust with repercussions in scientific funding has led to mandates courses in ethics for students training for scientific research careers. Having concentrated their course work in laboratory-based science, these students have less familiarity with philosophy and consequently struggle with the ethical reasoning aspects of a course in science and ethics. Discovery of a therapeutic drug or device opens a complex web of regulations by Food and Drug Administration for the ethical use of human subjects. Again the ethical system is one of rules and conduct based norms without foundational philosophical support for the ethical principles used in the guidelines. Rules of law reflect corrective action. Engaging students in case studies helps alert them to potential ethical dilemmas and invites them to explore why one action is right, good or better than an alternative. Narrative ethics provides a human presence to competing and compelling claims, the intersection of which is the ethical issue and concept. Dissection narratives help students explore how ethics can be taught and learned in a pluralistic society and remain relevant to the field of expertise they have chosen. The challenge lies in finding the best methods for teaching ethics in a particular discipline. Is there a code of ethics that applies crossculturally and across disciplines? Early and often should be the mantra of teaching ethics throughout the development of the individual and emergent professional.