Komparasi Teori Kebenaran Mo Tzu Dan Pancasila: Relevansi Bagi Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan di Indonesia

Jurnal Filsafat 26 (1):1-29 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mo Tzu's theory of truth and the truth of the theory of Pancasila both using three understand the truth, namely: coherence, correspondence, and paragmatik. However, both theories are necessary dikomparasikan truth. Necessary to find similarities and differences. Then look for relevance to the development of science in Indonesia as a country based on Pancasila. This study is a literature. The method used in this research is a philosophical hermeneutic method, with the following elements: description, historical continuity, comparison and reflection. The results showed that there are some similarities and differences between the theory of truth Mo Tzu and Pancasila. Relevance to the development of science in Indonesia, that the truth must be coherent with the values of Pancasila, should correspond to the reality of God, man, one, people, and fair. In addition, the truth must be beneficial for humanity which believes God, keeps unitary, democratic, and justice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
8 (#1,591,922)

6 months
4 (#1,288,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references