The Mereological Foundation of Megethology

Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):227-235 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Mathematics is megethology. Philosophia Mathematica, 1, 3–23) David K. Lewis proposes a structuralist reconstruction of classical set theory based on mereology. In order to formulate suitable hypotheses about the size of the universe of individuals without the help of set-theoretical notions, he uses the device of Boolos’ plural quantification for treating second order logic without commitment to set-theoretical entities. In this paper we show how, assuming the existence of a pairing function on atoms, as the unique assumption non expressed in a mereological language, a mereological foundation of set theory is achievable within first order logic. Furthermore, we show how a mereological codification of ordered pairs is achievable with a very restricted use of the notion of plurality without plural quantification

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Meghetologia.Massimiliano Carrara & Filippo Mancini - 2020 - Aphex. Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitica 21 (1):1-49.
On the ontological commitment of mereology.Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):164-174.
Pieces of mereology.Andrzej Pietruszczak - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):211-234.
Mathematics is megethology.David K. Lewis - 1993 - Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):3-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-22

Downloads
931 (#22,959)

6 months
167 (#21,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.
Nominalist platonism.George Boolos - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (3):327-344.

View all 16 references / Add more references