Exceptionalism, Information Categories and the Relevance of Gender

American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):65-67 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dupras and Bunnik take on the particular privacy risks of multi-omics, in particular via a contrast and comparison of genomics and epigenomics, followed by a consideration of the issues in r...

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2021.1991045

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Whose Data, Whose Risk? Omics Privacy Concerns Should be Defined by Individuals, not Researchers.Sabrina F. Derrington, Matthew A. Deardorff, Alexander R. Judkins & Xiaowu Gai - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):67-70.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases.Charles Dupras & Eline M. Bunnik - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4-6.
Whose Data Are They Anyway? Identification of Relatives and Genetic Exceptionalism.Robert I. Field - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):78-79.
Is Dupras and Bunnik’s Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases Still Too Exceptionalist?Karla Alex & Eva C. Winkler - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):80-82.
Data Properties or Analytical Methodologies: Too Much Attention to the Former Ignores Concerns About the Latter.Mathias Brochhausen & D. Micah Hester - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):70-72.
Toward a Framework for Assessing Privacy Risks in Multi-Omic Research and Databases.Charles Dupras & Eline M. Bunnik - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):46-64.
Scrutinizing Privacy in Multi-Omics Research: How to Provide Ethical Grounding for the Identification of Privacy-Relevant Data Properties.C. W. Safarlou, A. L. Bredenoord, R. Vermeulen & K. R. Jongsma - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):73-75.
Ownership of Genetic Data: Between Universalism and Contextualism?Henri-Corto Stoeklé & Christian Hervé - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (12):75-77.
Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision?Carolyn Riley Chapman, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Heini M. Natri, Courtney Berrios, Patrick Dwyer, Kellie Owens, Síofra Heraty & Arthur L. Caplan - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 25 (2):47-60.
A Pragmatic Consideration of Ethical Issues Relating to Personal Genomics.Andro Hsu, Joanna Mountain, Anne Wojcicki & Linda Avey - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-22

Downloads
21 (#1,008,197)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Chadwick
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Null. Null - 2016 - Philosophy Study 6 (9).
Moral Case for Legal Age Change.Joona Räsänen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):461-464.

Add more references