A question of universality: Inclusive education and the principle of respect

Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (4):775–793 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The universalist argument that all children should be educated in inclusive mainstream schools, irrespective of their difficulties or disabilities, is traced to the claims that special schools and disability ‘labels’ are inherently humiliating, and that no decent society tolerates inherently humiliating institutions. I ask whether there is a sound reason for a child to feel humiliated by special schools/disability ‘labels’ as such, and find none. Empirically, some do and some do not find these humiliating, and it is argued that the failure to address the multiple ‘realities’ of disability and learning difficulty is responsible for the policy impasse in this area

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
102 (#207,407)

6 months
14 (#229,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Sense and Sensibilia.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press. Edited by G. Warnock.
The Sovereignty of Good.Iris Murdoch - 1970 - New York,: Routledge.
The Sovereignty of Good.Iris Murdoch - 1971 - Religious Studies 8 (2):180-181.

View all 13 references / Add more references