The movement from ethics to social relationships for Levinas, and why decency obscures obligation

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (2):89-100 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Emmanuel Levinas, the individual bears an infinite obligation to the other person. In the Talmudic reading “Judaism and revolution,” Levinas suggests that we move from the ethical encounter to social relationships using contracts—both particular contracts and the social contract. So social relationships are created by limiting obligation, and as a result these relationships can only be practically acceptable, not ethical. Jewish religious practice for Levinas should also be understood as a set of negotiated limits to our infinite obligation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-12

Downloads
58 (#370,883)

6 months
8 (#594,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marc A. Cohen
Seattle University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Totality and infinity.Emmanuel Levinas - 1961/1969 - Pittsburgh,: Duquesne University Press.
The ethics of Emmanuel Levinas.Diane Perpich - 2008 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Discovering Levinas.Michael L. Morgan - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 10 references / Add more references