Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1):61-74 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely thought that the acceptability of an abstraction principle is a feature of the cardinalities at which it is satisfiable. This view is called into question by a recent observation by Richard Heck. We show that a fix proposed by Heck fails but we analyze the interesting idea on which it is based, namely that an acceptable abstraction has to “generate” the objects that it requires. We also correct and complete the classification of proposed criteria for acceptable abstraction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Criteria for Acceptable Abstraction.Øystein Linnebo - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):331-338.
Which abstraction principles are acceptable? Some limitative results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):673-696.
Introduction.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):321-329.
Bad company tamed.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391.
Abstraction and grounding.Louis deRosset & Øystein Linnebo - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 109 (1):357-390.
Relative categoricity and abstraction principles.Sean Walsh & Sean Ebels-Duggan - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):572-606.
Cantor's Abstractionism and Hume's Principle.Claudio Ternullo & Luca Zanetti - 2021 - History and Philosophy of Logic 43 (3):284-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-16

Downloads
132 (#172,365)

6 months
13 (#215,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Roy T. Cook
University of St. Andrews
Øystein Linnebo
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Collective Abstraction.Jon Erling Litland - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (4):453-497.
Two-Sorted Frege Arithmetic is Not Conservative.Stephen Mackereth & Jeremy Avigad - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (4):1199-1232.
Abstraction and Four Kinds of Invariance.Roy T. Cook - 2017 - Philosophia Mathematica 25 (1):3–25.
Tuples all the Way Down?Simon Thomas Hewitt - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):161-169.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Frege's Theorem.Richard G. Heck - 2011 - New York: Clarendon Press.
Frege’s Theorem: An Introduction.Richard G. Heck - 1999 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 7 (1):56-73.
The Limits of Abstraction.Kit Fine - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):554-557.

View all 12 references / Add more references