Commentary

In Jeffrey S. Bowers & Chad J. Marsolek (eds.), Rethinking Implicit Memory. Oxford University Press UK (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The point that priming and related phenomena of implicit memory should be considered functional and adaptive is made by several authors, notably by Bowers and Kouider and by Marsolek. Cognitive processes reflect highly evolved brain processes and mechanisms, and it is a very reasonable assumption that all cognitive processes act to improve the fit between organism and environment. A second general point is that the cognitive system is to be understood as a whole, not as a group of separate functions such as memory, perception, categorization, and so on. The various phenomena associated with priming fit very comfortably into this framework.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Implicit memory: A commentary.Henry L. Roediger - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (4):373-380.
Automatic processes in addiction: A commentary.Kent C. Berridge & Terry E. Robinson - 2006 - In Reinout W. Wiers & Alan W. Stacy (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction. Sage Publications. pp. 477--481.
What is Priming and Why?Chad J. Marsolek - 2002 - In Jeffrey S. Bowers & Chad J. Marsolek (eds.), Rethinking Implicit Memory. Oxford University Press UK.
Colloquium 4 Commentary on Garrocho.Santiago Ramos - 2020 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 35 (1):121-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
8 (#1,587,259)

6 months
8 (#610,780)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references