Art: What is it Good For?

(2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Art is changing, and a great deal of contemporary work does not fit into the categories of the past. Is "conceptual" work art at all? Should artists learn a traditional craft before their work is considered valuable? Can we learn to love art, or must we take it or leave it? These questions and more are discussed in six essays from people on different sides of the debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,839

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Possibility of the aesthetic experience.Michael H. Mitias (ed.) - 1986 - Norwell, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Academic.
Beauty and art, 1750-2000.Elizabeth Prettejohn - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Art Interpretation.Barbara Elissa Savedoff - 1988 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Art: Dvd.Ken Knisely, Verna Gehring & John Loughney - 2001 - Milk Bottle Productions.
The Thought of Art.Lauren Alexa Tillinghast - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Chicago
The British Avant-Garde.Deborah Fitzgerald - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:49-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-13

Downloads
14 (#1,356,443)

6 months
1 (#1,599,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references