Comments on Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos

Philosophia Christi 18 (2):307-312 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present essay is a response to Keith Ward’s recent book, Christ and the Cosmos. While deeply appreciative of this fine book, I raise two criticisms of it: Ward’s claim that we can know nothing of the divine essence has disturbing implications, the main one of which is that there may be large disjunctions between what God has revealed to us about the divine nature and the divine nature in itself. Ward’s criticisms of the social theory of the Trinity are not compelling and indeed edge his own view close to modalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Objections to Ward’s Trinitarian Theology.Dale Tuggy - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):363-373.
Rethinking the Trinity.Chad Meister - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):271-280.
A Cosmic Christ?William Hasker - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):333-341.
Ward’s Trinity and the Stubborn Jews.Jerome Gellman - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):375-385.
Response to Keith Ward, Christ and the Cosmos.Richard Swinburne - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):297-305.
Personal idealism.Keith Ward - 2021 - London: Darton, Longman & Todd.
Review of Keith Ward's The Christian Idea of God. [REVIEW]James S. Spiegel - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):213-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
25 (#921,682)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references