Freedom of Conscience, Professional Responsibility, and Access to Abortion

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (3):280-285 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Access to abortion is becoming increasingly restricted for many women in the United States. Besides the longstanding financial barriers facing low-income women in most states, a newer source of scarcity has emerged. The relatively small number of physicians willing to perform the procedure is compromising the ability of women in certain parts of the country to obtain an abortion.Do physicians have a duty to respond to this situation? Do they have a professional responsibility to ensure that abortions are reasonably available to the women who want to terminate their pregnancies? Or, is abortion so morally and socially controversial as to remove any professional obligation to provide reasonable access?Both law and medical ethics have traditionally protected physicians’ freedom to refuse to perform any procedure, including abortion, that conflicts with their religious or other moral beliefs.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Texas Ruling and Undue Burdens.Rachel Hill - 2014 - Voices in Bioethics 1.
Texas House Bill 2.Rachel Hill - 2015 - Voices in Bioethics 1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
43 (#518,702)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?