Bridges and the Hopkins MSS: 1889–1930

Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 47 (3):428-446 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That Bridges recognized the value of Hopkins's work speaks well of his judgment; that his appreciation was only superficial betrays his spiritual, emotional, and critical limitations

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00406457

DOI

10.5840/thought197247332

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

William Blake and His Poverty.Robert R. Hull - 1930 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 5 (2):281-297.
William Blake and the Technological Age.Eileen Sanzo - 1971 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 46 (4):577-591.
The Divided Self in Shakespeare and Hopkins.Peter Milward - 1972 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 47 (2):253-270.
A King and His People.Robert A. Hewitt - 1939 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 14 (1):16-18.
Of God and His Creatures.James V. Mullaney - 1951 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 26 (4):617-618.
Zoroaster and His World. [REVIEW]Arthur F. J. Remy - 1948 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 23 (3):509-513.
A Hopkins Reader.Raymond V. Schoder - 1953 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 28 (4):619-621.
Hopkins’ Imagery.Robert Boyle - 1960 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 35 (1):57-90.
Hopkins’ Imagery.Robert Boyle - 1960 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 35 (1):57-90.
His Dear Persuasion. [REVIEW]Edward B. Bunn - 1940 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 15 (4):701-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
48 (#462,030)

6 months
3 (#1,481,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references