Erratum: BJHS September 1999 issue

[author unknown]
British Journal for the History of Science 33 (1):127-127 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the essay review by Arne Hessenbruch published in our September 1999 issue, a proof reading error occurred on p. 356. The second sentence of the last paragraph on that page should have read ‘It demotes the importance of the scientific context, and so the biographer and the reader do not really have to understand it’. We apologize to Dr Hessenbruch for this error.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Correction.[author unknown] - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Science 32 (2):251-251.
Correction.[author unknown] - 1993 - British Journal for the History of Science 26 (3):383-383.
Announcements.[author unknown] - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (2):517-517.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1993 - Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):i-i.
Correction.[author unknown] - 1991 - British Journal for the History of Science 24 (2):270-270.
"Piaget and the death of God": Erratum.Brian Vandenberg - 1991 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):150-150.
Erratum.[author unknown] - 1998 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 30 (2):103-103.
Intransitivity and vagueness - corrigendum.Joseph Y. Halpern - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (3):591-591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
2 (#1,896,584)

6 months
2 (#1,690,857)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references