Three assumptions of Rawlsian reflective equilibrium

Abstract

John Rawls recommends a reflective equilibrium method for evaluating which principles institutions should abide by. In this paper, I identify and challenge three assumptions that he makes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-17

Downloads
666 (#39,210)

6 months
106 (#56,631)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium.Peter Singer - 1974 - The Monist 58 (3):490-517.
Mysticism and Logic.Bertrand Russell - 1914 - Hibbert Journal 12:780-803.
Reflective Equilibrium Without Intuitions?Georg Brun - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):237-252.
Mysticism and Logic.B. Russell - 1953 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 15 (2):334-334.
What is wrong with reflective equilibria?D. W. Haslett - 1987 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (148):305-311.

View all 6 references / Add more references