A Vindication of Tarski's Claim About the Liar Paradox

In TImothy Childers (ed.), The Logica Yearbook. Acadamy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Truth, the Liar, and Tarski's Semantics.Gila Sher - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 143–163.
Liar-Like Paradoxes and Metalanguage Features.Klaus Ladstaetter - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):61-70.
Burge's Contextual Theory of Truth and the Super-Liar Paradox.Matt Leonard - 2012 - In Michal Pelis Vit Puncochar (ed.), The Logica Yearbook 2011. College Publications.
A new defense of Tarski's solution to the liar paradox.Gila Sher - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 180 (5-6):1441-1466.
Not so deep inconsistency: a reply to Eklund.Jc Beall & Graham Priest - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Logic 5:74-84.
Choosing Normative Concepts, written by Matti Eklund. [REVIEW]Nicholas Drake - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (4):441-444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matti Eklund
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

An illocutionary logical explanation of the liar paradox.John T. Kearns - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):31-66.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references