“Evidence-Debased Medicine” and the Integrity of the Medical Profession

Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (1):71-73 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Patients trust physicians to prescribe based on their fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of their patients, and physicians prescribe based on confidence in research data and clinical guidelines. Recent reports erode confidence in evidence-based medicine. Through self-regulation and a willingness to change, the medical profession can assert its status as a profession distinct from outside influence, serving one interest: the healthcare of patients and the public.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should physicians fake diagnoses to help their patients?G. Helgesson & N. Lynoe - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):133-136.
Are doctors altruistic?W. Glannon - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):68-69.
The origins of medical evidence: Communication and experimentation.Joachim Widder - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):99-104.
Supererogation and the profession of medicine.A. C. McKay - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (2):70-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
66 (#317,557)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references