- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An outline of an argument for robust metanormative realism
Oxford Studies in Metaethics 2:21-50 (2007)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Enoch, David. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 295. $75.00. [REVIEW]Richard Joyce - 2013 - Ethics 123 (2):365-369.
David Enoch, Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 336. ISBN 978-0-19-957996-9, $75.00 Hbk. [REVIEW]David Faraci - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (2):259-267.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism, by David Enoch.T. Cuneo - 2012 - Mind 121 (484):1059-1064.
David Enoch, Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism , pp. xi + 295. [REVIEW]Knut Olav Skarsaune - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (4):487-490.
Robust ethical realism, non-naturalism, and normativity.William Joseph FitzPatrick - 2008 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3:159-205.
Review of David Enoch, "Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism". [REVIEW]Ralph Wedgwood - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):389-393.
If You Cannot Help Being Committed to It, then It Exists: A Defence of Robust Normative Realism.Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (4):823-841.
Enoch, David. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. [REVIEW]Jeff Behrends - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):146-148.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-09
Downloads
235 (#110,647)
6 months
6 (#846,711)
2014-03-09
Downloads
235 (#110,647)
6 months
6 (#846,711)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism: how best to understand it, and how to cope with it.David Enoch - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):413-438.
Against quietist normative realism.Tristram McPherson - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):223-240.
Ethical Non-Naturalism and the Metaphysics of Supervenience.Tristram McPherson - 2012 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 7. Oxford University Press. pp. 205.
Reply to Copp: Naturalism, normativity, and the varieties of realism worth worrying about.Sharon Street - 2008 - Philosophical Issues 18 (1):207-228.
How is Moral Disagreement a Problem for Realism?David Enoch - 2009 - The Journal of Ethics 13 (1):15-50.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2