La nozione di nemico nel discorso dei filosofi: verso una tassonomia del concetto

Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 32 (62) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study reviews and classifies the most common uses of the terms “enemy” and “enmity” within the context of traditional philosophical discourse. In order to contribute to a structured understanding of these concepts, we proceed in two steps. We first explore the auxiliary uses of the terms, which we distinguish from each other according to their axiological connotations. In a second part, we review the technical uses of the concepts known to philosophy of law. Here, we distinguish between two different approaches to the concept, one of which defines it through qualitative criteria, and a second approach that uses the term as a quantifier.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Linguistic Evidence for Expressivism.Andrés Soria Ruiz & Isidora Stojanovic - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 86:155-180.
Bibliografia sul concetto di cooperazione.Michele Filippini - 2014 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 26 (50).
On representation, goals and cognition.Peter Lanz & David Mcfarland - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (2):121 – 133.
Introduzione. Foucault: discorso politico e filosofia.Alessandro Pandolfi - 2015 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 27 (52).
‘Species’ without species.Aaron Novick & W. Ford Doolittle - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 87 (C):72-80.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-08

Downloads
15 (#1,229,188)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references