Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs

Boston: De Gruyter (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This volume focuses on Berkeley's doctrine of signs. The 'doctrine of signs' refers to the use that Berkeley makes of a phenomenon that is central to a great deal of everyday discourse: one whereby certain perceivable entities are made to stand in for (as 'signs' of) something else. Things signified might be other perceivable entities or they might also be unperceivable notions - such as the meanings of words. From his earliest published work, A New Theory of Vision in 1710, to those works written towards the end of life, including Alciphron in 1732, Berkeley is at pains to emphasise the crucial role that sign-usage, particularly (but not only) in language, plays in human life. Berkeley also connects sign-usage to our (human) relationship with God: an issue that was right of the heart of his philosophical project. The contributions in this volume explore the myriad ways that Berkeley built on such insights to better understand a range of philosophical issues - issues of epistemology, language, perception, mental representation, mathematics, science, and theology. The aim of this volume is to establish that the doctrine of signs can be seen as one of the unifying themes of Berkeley's philosophy. What's more, this theme is one which spans his whole philosophical corpus; not just his best-known works like the Principles and the Three Dialogues, but also his works on science, mathematics, and theology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Berkeley's Doctrine of Signs.William McGowan - 1982 - In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Univ of Minnesota Press.
4 Why Berkeley was not a Representationalist.Katia Saporiti - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 67-80.
6 Does Berkeley Have a Theory of Meaning?Margaret Atherton - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 99-126.
7 Berkeley On the Meaning of General Terms.Keota Fields - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 127-142.
Did Berkeley Endorse the Resemblance Theory of Representation?Dávid Bartha - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 27-48.
10 Mathematics: Signification and Significance.Clare Marie Moriarty - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 185-210.
8 Natural Causes and Berkeley’s Divine Language Hypothesis.Todd DeRose - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 143-160.
11 The Future State and the Signs of Desire.Tom Stoneham - 2024 - In Manuel Fasko & Peter West (eds.), Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 211-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-30

Downloads
29 (#750,617)

6 months
17 (#163,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Manuel Fasko
University of Basel
Peter West
Northeastern University London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Origins of Objectivity.Tyler Burge - 2010 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.Thomas Reid - 1785 - University Park, Pa.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Derek R. Brookes & Knud Haakonssen.
The philosophical writings of Descartes.René Descartes - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 98 references / Add more references