Interrogating the Boundary of Human-Level and T Moral Status

&
American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):61-63 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/21507741003699330

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Implications Do a Consciousness-Independent Perspective on Moral Status Entail for Future Brain Organoid Research?Masanori Kataoka & Tsutomu Sawai - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):163-165.
Non-Human Moral Status: Problems with Phenomenal Consciousness.Joshua Shepherd - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):148-157.
A Teleological Approach to the Ontological Status of Human Cerebral Organoids.Takuya Niikawa, Yoshiyuki Hayashi & Tsutomu Sawai - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):204-206.
Prospective Benefit plus Moral Status: A Hybrid Model.Peter Maloy Koch - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (2-3):146-148.
Contesting the Consciousness Criterion: A More Radical Approach to the Moral Status of Non-Humans.Joan Llorca-Albareda & Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):158-160.
Artificial Consciousness Is Morally Irrelevant.Bruce P. Blackshaw - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):72-74.
Moral Status or Moral Value? The Former May Require Phenomenal Consciousness, But Does It Matter?Adina L. Roskies - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 14 (2):175-177.
Response to Commentators on “Confronting Deep Moral Disagreement: The President's Council on Bioethics, Moral Status, and Human Embryos”.Lawrence J. Nelson & Michael J. Meyer - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):W14-W16.
Response to a Neuroskeptic: Neuroscientific Endeavor Versus Clinical Boundary Violation.Rael D. Strous - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (2):24-26.
What Role is “Pure Experience” Consciousness Supposed to Play in Medical Ethics?: Pure Experience, Moral Status, and Clinical Decisions.Michael S. Dauber - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (2):117-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
27 (#825,296)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Fenton
Dalhousie University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
Primate Cognition.Amanda Seed & Michael Tomasello - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):407-419.
Drawing lines.James Rachels - 2004 - In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal rights: current debates and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 162--174.

Add more references