Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system

BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):63 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Institutional review boards distinguish health care quality improvement and health care quality improvement research based primarily on the rigor of the methods used and the purported generalizability of the knowledge gained. Neither of these criteria holds up upon scrutiny. Rather, this apparently false dichotomy may foster under-protection of participants in QI projects and over-protection of participants within QIR

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quality improvement projects and research review.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):394-394.
Learning Health Systems and the Revised Common Rule.Joshua A. Rolnick - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (2):238-246.
Quality Improvement Ethics: Lessons From the SUPPORT Study.Benjamin S. Wilfond - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):14-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-17

Downloads
50 (#457,975)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile