Separability assumptions in scoring-rule-based arguments for probabilism

Abstract

- In decision theory, an agent is deciding how to value a gamble that results in different outcomes in different states. Each outcome gets a utility value for the agent.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

When the (Bayesian) ideal is not ideal.Danilo Fraga Dantas - 2023 - Logos and Episteme 15 (3):271-298.
Measuring Belief and Risk Attitude.Sven Neth - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:354–364.
Risk and Tradeoffs.Lara Buchak - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S6):1091-1117.
Consequentialism and Bayesian Rationality in Normal Form Games.Peter Hammond - 1998 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 5:187-196.
Conditionalization, cogency, and cognitive value.Graham Oddie - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):533-541.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-12

Downloads
196 (#125,074)

6 months
10 (#381,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Branden Fitelson
Northeastern University
Lara Buchak
Princeton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references